“Alien” meets “Gravity” meets a smattering of other sci-fi thrillers in “Life,” a space tale that suffers from the lack of originality, but makes up for it in thrills.
Taking place almost entirely aboard the International Space Station, a crew of astronauts from around the globe (including Jake Gyllenhaal, Rebecca Ferguson and Ryan Reynolds) marvel at the creation of a Martian organism, which rapidly grows into squid-like creature that’s hell-bent on killing each one of them.
Director Daniel Espinosa (“Safe Room”) creates a tense atmosphere as the film builds to an inevitable conclusion with a “Twilight Zone”-like twist. Espinosa gets high marks especially for creating a pair of on-screen demises that may never have been done before. It’s too bad the rest of the film couldn’t have been as inspired.
Director Danny Boyle reunites his incredible cast from the original “Trainspotting” 21 years ago with the cheekily titled “T2,” a compelling sequel to the original crime tale about the dangers surrounding a group of heroin junkies in Scotland in the 1990s.
“T2” appropriately picks up 20 years after the events of the first film, where Mark Renton (Ewan McGregor), returns to Scotland after he stole 16 thousand pounds from his friends to bolt from the country and build a new life in Amsterdam.
But when that life falls apart, he decides to try to make amends with two members of the group (Jonny Lee Miller and Ewen Bremer); a move that puts him in peril because the other friend, the psychotic Franco Begbie (Robert Carlyle, who is frightening and funny at the same time) wants Renton dead in the worst way.
Marked by great performances, fantastic tunes and inventive direction by Boyle, fans of the original will especially love “T2,” which perfectly brings the tale of Renton and his mates completely full circle after a 20-year wait.
The tale as old as time gets a fresh, new interpretation with “Beauty and the Beast,” Disney’s hotly anticipated live-action remake of their 1991 animated version. It’s a beautiful film from start to finish as long as you try to leave behind any comparisons to the groundbreaking original – the first animated film to be nominated for a Best Picture Oscar – and enjoy it for what it is; a classic romantic tale that’s bolstered by an expanded storyline with new characters, more new songs and dazzling visuals and vistas.
Emma Watson takes on the monumental task of playing Belle, a young maiden whose main concern is taking care of her widowed father (Kevin Kline), a kindly clock- and gadget-maker who is taken prisoner at a castle housing a cursed prince (Dan Stevens). An arrogant ruler who cares little for the downtrodden, the prince is damned to an eternity as a beast unless someone can find it in their hearts to truly love him. He leads a sad and lonely existence, with his only company being his servants, who are turned into a variety of objects like clocks, teacups and candelabras when the spell is cast upon the prince.
Tim reviews “Beauty and the Beast” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show,” starting 10 minutes in. Also, Tim talks about the film and more with Bob Sansevere on “The BS Show”
http://thebsblog.com/2017/03/17/428-fox-9s-jim-rich-vikings-gophers-wild-beauty-beast-review/" target="_blank">here, starting 24 minutes in.
In an effort to rescue her father, Belle takes her father’s place as prisoner, and after a certain amount of time, takes kindly to the beast as he begins to show humility. But the clock is ticking fast on the beast, and if a rose that measures the passage of time loses all its petals, he will remain a beast forever. complicating matters is the arrogant aristocrat Gaston (Luke Evans), whose behavior becomes more and more vile as he seeks a reluctant Belle’s hand in marriage.
Expertly directed by “Dreamgirls” helmer Bill Condon, “Beauty and the Beast” delivers on all that’s promised, especially with music – Alan Menken penned new tunes for the film with lyricist Tim Rice to go along with the existing songs he wrote with the late Howard Ashman – and the visual effects.
The great thing is, as spectacular as the visuals are (the showstopper “Be Our Guest” is one of most dazzling scenes put on film in years), the technical side of “Beauty and the Beast” never dampens the performances by the stunning ensemble cast, which also includes Ian McKellen as the clock Cogsworth, Ewan McGregor as the candelabra Lumiere and Emma Thompson as the teapot Mrs. Potts. Stanley Tucci and Audra McDonald are also welcome additions to the cast, as the castle pianist and singer take the form of a piano and operatic-themed clothing dresser, respectively.
On the live-action side, the always-great Kline, Evans and Josh Gad (as Gaston’s bootlicking sidekick, LeFou), command the most attention, while Watson, while a good, if not great actress, becomes the film’s weak link. Granted, Watson has the weight of the world on her shoulders, but the role really demands a Broadway-caliber singer to fit the bill.
That’s not to say Watson can’t handle the tunes well – she does — but doesn’t come near to the performance of the songs by Paige O’Hara in the animated version. And that’s the quandary that Disney is going to have to face as they adapted more of their animated films into live-action: Do you cast a star like Watson, who is recognized worldwide because of the “Harry Potter” films? Or do you go with a Broadway vocalist who can take the songs to a whole new level? A large part of the reason the animated “Beauty and the Beast,” “The Little Mermaid” and “Mulan” became hits was because most people didn’t realize that such Broadway singers as Paige O’Hara, Jodi Benson and Lea Salonga were the voices behind the iconic lead characters.
No matter its flaws, “Beauty and the Beast” is a wonderful film throughout, and a welcome addition to Disney’s stable of live-action remakes or updates, including “Alice in Wonderland,” “Maleficent” and “Cinderella.” There’s no doubt you’ll emerge from the tale as old as time wanting more from Disney’s creative minds, and the those newly-imagined tales can’t come soon enough.
Director Jordan Vogt-Roberts brings out the best in the beast in “Kong: Skull Island,” an insanely entertaining update featuring the legendary movie monster.
While the film has its share of flaws, it doesn’t matter: “Kong” is summer popcorn movie that happens to have a March release date. With lots of bone-crushing action, explosions, mayhem, a great cast and an incredibly realistic rendering of King Kong, the movie franchise suddenly has a vibrant new life.
Set in 1973 after the end of the Vietnam War, the great thing about “Kong: Skull Island” is that it’s not a remake of “King Kong.” The action takes place almost entirely on Skull Island, and there’s no transporting Kong back to New York City to be put on display.
Here, Kong remains in his natural habitat in a virtually inaccessible island in the South Pacific, and he doesn’t like it when a secret government exploration team with a military escort invades his space. The problem, as the humans come to discover, is that Kong isn’t the only creature on the island, giving the movie an intense “King Kong” meets “Jurassic World” feel.
LINK: See Tim Lammers’ archived video and audio interviews, including Denzel Washington, Casey Affleck, Angelina Jolie, Morgan Freeman, Hugh Jackman, Francis Ford
While the star of “Kong ” is the title character, the film’s cast doesn’t entirely get lots in the island madness. While Tom Hiddleston, Brie Larson, John Goodman, Corey Hawkins, Toby Kebbell and Samuel L. Jackson all fit the bill, the actor who steals the show is John C. Reilly as a pilot stranded on island for almost 30 years. From the very first time Reilly pops on the big screen with long, frizzy beard and looking like a madman, Reilly is a hoot.
Make sure to stick around for an after-credits scene, which sets up more “Kong” adventures. All told, “Kong: Skull Island” is a roarin’ good time.
It seems that Hugh Jackman has saved his best performance as Wolverine for last.
Jackman, of course, defined the role of the adamantium-clawed mutant in 2000’s “X-Men” — and reprised the role eight more times (including the new film) in the ensuing years — is brilliant in “Logan,” which the actor previously announced would be his last turn in the movie saga.
Expertly directed by “The Wolverine” helmer James Mangold, “Logan” strips the “X-Men” mythos to the bare essentials, and in the process, results in a raw and compelling superhero adventure. Concentrating mainly on three mutants, the film easily sets itself apart from the previous “X-Men” films in story, character development and action.
Audio slideshow: James Mangold talks “Logan”
Based on the “Old Man Logan” storyline from the Marvel Comics, “Logan” is set in 2029, in a society where mutants have all but been eradicated, and Logan/Wolverine, Professor Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and Caliban (Stephen Merchant) take shelter in a run-down hideout on the Mexican border.
Old, cranky and sick, Logan and Charles are living a shadow of an existence, until a desperate woman tracks down Logan and pleads with him to transport a 10-year-old girl named Laura (a spectacular Dafne Keen) to a safe haven in northern part of the United States. Logan’s reluctant to do it, until a militaristic government organization shows up, seeking her capture. It turns out that the girl is a mutant as well, and her ties to Logan may be closer than he thinks.
Twentieth Century Fox definitely made the right move by allowing Jackman and Mangold to make “Logan” a R-rated film, the same sort of strategy that propelled “Deadpool” to worldwide blockbuster status last year. “Logan,” however, doesn’t have a wiseass tone like “Deadpool,” and is much more serious. It’s ultra-violent and bloody (what else would you expect from a guy with steely claws?), and without question earns the distinction of being the “John Wick” of superhero movies.
That’s not to say it doesn’t have its share of comedic moments, particularly between Logan and Charles, who bicker at each other like a pair of grumpy old men (or is it grumpy old mutants?). It’s a real hoot to hear Charles – the majestic professor in the previous films – drop the F-bombs like there’s no tomorrow.
The sad part of “Logan” is, it appears to be the end of the road for Stewart as Charles, too. You can’t help but feel a sense of sadness as “Logan” wraps up, knowing that Jackman and the always-great Stewart are hanging it up.
But as we’ve learned in “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” there’s nothing ever final in the “X-Men” universe.
Lammometer: 9 (out of 10)
Copyright 2017 DirectConversations.com.
Original Interviews, Reviews & More By Tim Lammers