Tag Archives: Helena Bonham Carter

Interview: Hayley Atwell talks new TV adaptation of ‘Howards End’

The past seven years have been quite eventful for acclaimed actress Hayley Atwell, who has been working non-stop on the big and small screens following her breakthrough role in 2011 as Agent Peggy Carter opposite Chris Evans in “Captain America: The First Avenger.”

The role has not only provided Atwell an opportunity to reprise the role in three more Marvel Cinematic Universe projects, but on TV’s “Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D” and her own series, “Agent Carter.” On top of that, Atwell’s good fortunes landed her a small but pivotal role in director Kenneth Branagh’s opulent live-action adaptation of Disney’s “Cinderella,” and in August, she’ll appear opposite Ewan McGregor in Disney’s live-action/animated hybrid, “Christopher Robin,” based on the animated tales of Winnie the Pooh.

Suffice it to say, Atwell is more than used to the daunting task of tackling time-honored stories and characters in her career, and on Sunday, fans will get to see the 36-year-old performer take on perhaps her most challenging role yet — as the legendary character Margaret Schlegel on STARZ’s miniseries adaptation of E.M. Forester’s classic novel “Howards End.”

In a recent phone conversation from London, Atwell said she was thrilled that director Hettie Macdonald and scribe Kenneth Lonergan could give “Howards End” time to breathe as a four-hour miniseries. Without question, there’s so much more to the narrative than what film fans were treated to with the critically lauded, 2 hour, 22 minute Merchant/Ivory version of “Howards End” a quarter-century ago, and Atwell couldn’t wait to help tell it.

“They wanted to take the time to explore the intellectual depth of E.M. Forster’s book, and I don’t mean intellectual in the sense of trying to make it academic or inaccessible. Instead, I think the heart of the story is about emotional intelligence,” Atwell said. “It shows our ability to move forward as human beings, as long as we are willing to engage in conversation about our differences rather that divide ourselves because of them. The story doesn’t shy away from questions and big ideas like social reform, and understanding social status and economic backgrounds, and the opportunities that one had back then, merely based on the family that you were part of.”

Set in Edwardian London in the early 1900s, Howards End tells the story of three families from different classes — the well-to-do Wilcoxes, the middle class Schlegels and lower class Basts — and how their lives fatefully intersect despite their vast differences in wealth and lifestyle. Atwell stars as Margaret Schlegel, who along with her sister, Helen (Philippa Coulthard), boast fiery independent spirits who find a cause in helping Leonard Bast (Joseph Quinn), an insurance clerk who is sliding deep into poverty. The dynamic between the sisters begins to change, though, when Margaret marries Henry Wilcox (Matthew Macfayden), the widowed patriarch of the Wilcox clan and head of the family’s business empire.

Establishing new pathways

There’s no doubt a giant looming in the background of the new TV adaptation in the form of the acclaimed 1992 film version of “Howards End,” which starred Emma Thompson, Anthony Hopkins and Helena Bonham Carter, and earned three Oscars including a Best Actress statuette for Thompson. Atwell is well-aware that some fans are going to want to compare it to the 1992 film, yet is confident that this new adaptation of the 1910 novel has established its own identity.

“It’s a question that just never comes up in the theater. When I played ‘Major Barbara’ on the Olivier stage at the National Theater, the question in the press was not, ‘Do you feel pressure because Judi Dench played her in 1960s?’ because I would have been like, ‘No, the reason I’m an actor is that I want to have a go at telling the story of a character,'” Atwell said. “I like telling stories in theater because the pieces transcend time and deal with universal themes, and then each production gets an opportunity within that place of time that they are to interpret that text.”

Philippa Coulthard and Hayley Atwell in "Howards End' (photo: STARZ)

Effectively, Atwell wants viewers to look at “Howards End” through the same sort of lens, because while the story is set in the exact same time period as the source material, people’s views of how they look at the world have changed. Besides, Atwell, who describes herself as a “restless mind that longs to be challenged intellectually as well as emotionally,” wouldn’t have engaged in the project if it didn’t provide new promise.

“Our version of ‘Howards End’ is an adaptation of a classic book and a masterpiece told in 2017. The sensibilities that we have now are different than they were 25 years ago. There’s really no cause for comparison,” Atwell said. “While Emma Thompson and Anthony Hopkins so beautifully told their version of that story very successfully, it doesn’t mean that our path has already been paved. The material is so rich that now we can do something exquisite with it. In 2017, we became the custodians of these characters and we’re choosing our path now.”

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for The KQ92 Morning Show,” “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC), WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere.
Copyright 2018 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Movie reviews: ‘Alice Through the Looking Glass,’ ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’

Disney

By Tim Lammers

“Alice Through the Looking Glass” (PG) 3 stars (out of 4)

Wonderland is as buoyant, beautiful and bright as ever in “Alice Through the Looking Glass,” a satisfying prequel/sequel to the 2010 billion-dollar blockbuster. Despite a thin storyline, the film is once again bolstered by a lovable cast, spectacular visual effects and stunning production design and costumes. Fans will likely favor the original “Alice” to this follow-up, but it’s an entertaining film nonetheless.

Mia Wasikowska returns as Alice, who after three years of adventures at sea and exploring new lands with her late father’s ship returns home and is beckoned to Underland by Absolem (voice of Alan Rickman, in his final film role), the blue caterpillar-turned-butterfly. Turns out that Alice’s old, dear friend the Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp) is dying of a broken heart, since he happened upon a remnant that reminded him of the tragic loss of his family to the Jabberwocky years before.

After pleas from the White Queen (Anne Hathaway) and company to find a way to save Hatter, Mia sets out to snatch from the personification of Time (Sacha Baron Cohen) the Chronosphere – the power source that runs the Grand Clock. It will enable Alice to travel back in time and right the wrongs of the past – that is if her enemy, the banished Red Queen (Helena Bonham Carter), doesn’t get the device first in a bid to get her crown back.

While Wasikowska and Depp are as strong as they were in “Alice in Wonderland,” Bonham Carter once again steals the show with her big head, bombastic personality, wild chants and maniacal laughs. Her performance alone makes “Through the Looking Glass” worth peering into, even though the time travel narrative falls far short of the events that sparked “Wonderland.” Baron Cohen (along with some CGI mechanical minions) proves to be a grand addition to the “Alice” film family as Time, a touchy taskmaster whose ticker is weakened by the Red Queen and her wicked wiles.

While “Alice Through the Looking Glass” has its share of flaws, the film’s spectacular visual effects make up for the shortcomings. Director James Bobin smartly crafted several jaw-dropping sequences, including trips across the Oceans of Time (which allows the film to cross over into prequel territory). The film also boasts stunning costumes and breathtakingly beautiful settings, both real and virtual. They’re wondrous visions to behold.

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

“X-Men: Apocalypse” (PG-13) 2 stars (out of four)

X misses the spot in “X-Men: Apocalypse,” a lackluster follow-up to 2014’s brilliant “X-Men: Days of Future Past.” With a tedious 2 hour 20 minute runtime, an overload of visual effects and a plot spread far too thin across too many characters, director Bryan Singer’s fourth “X-Men” film is without question his weakest. It’s a shame because the talent is all there, but ultimately, they’re trounced by the overambitious storyline.

Picking up 10 years after the events of the 1970s (and the rewriting of X-Men history) with “Days of Future Past,” “Apocalypse” picks up in 1983 with the unearthing of the titular character, the all-powerful mutant taking the form in an armored, blue-skinned Oscar Isaac. Once entombed in Egypt, Apocalypse’s followers figure out the key to unleash the mutant, who is hell-bent (along with his four horsemen) on imposing his powers on the citizens of Earth because they’ve lost their way.

Having the wherewithal to even tap into the immense mind powers of Professor Charles Xavier (James McAvoy), Apocalypse seems unstoppable, that is until Raven/Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence), Hank McCoy/Beast (Nicholas Hoult) and a new band of mutant recruits (Tye Sheridan as Scott Summers/Cyclops, Sophie Turner as Jean Grey and Kodi Smit-McPhee as Nightcrawler) spring into action to recover their kidnapped mentor and desperately attempt to defeat a seemingly undefeatable enemy.

As passionate as Singer has been about the “X-Men” movie universe since the first film in 2000, you can’t fault him for trying to make the most out of his latest opportunity to tell another tale about the Marvel movie mutants. Yet at the same time, it feels like he’s trying too hard to one-up what transpired in “Days of Future Past” both in terms of the film’s overwhelming special effects and about a dozen mutants, causing the film to lose its focus.

By the time “X-Men Apocalypse” limps to the end, you get the sense that this current iteration of the “X-Men” movie saga is up as its next generation is trained to take on its next foes. It’s too bad, considering the prequel films that came before it started off with such promise, only to end in such an underwhelming fashion. It’s a real disappointment.

Interview: Helena Bonham Carter talks ‘Alice Through the Looking Glass’

Walt Disney

In U.S. online exclusive for D23.com, Tim Lammers talked with Helena Bonham Carter about reprising her scene-stealing role of The Red Queen for “Alice Through the Looking Glass.”

Read the entire D23 Q&A HERE.

Here’s a sample:

Tim Lammers: Was there a certain amount of reconditioning, vocally, since you screamed “Off with their heads!” quite a bit in “Alice in Wonderland”?

Helena Bonham Carter: It turned out to be very exhausting on the first day of production. I thought to myself, ‘I remember how to play this,’ and by lunchtime I didn’t have any voice left because I had been screaming for an hour (laughs). It was fun for a bit, then I realized, “I can’t do anymore and now I’m mute.”

TL: And was it exhausting, physically?

HBC: It was much more exhausting. The Red Queen is an exhausting character to play. I had a lot more to do and I think my part is actually bigger in this film. And, she’s unhappier. Can you believe it? And she’s even angrier.

“Alice Through the Looking Glass” opens in theaters nationwide Friday.

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Reviews: ‘Cinderella,’ ‘Frozen Fever,’ ‘Run All Night’

Lily James and Cate Blanchett in Cinderella

By Tim Lammers

“Cinderella” (PG) 4 stars (out of four)

Filmmaker Kenneth Branagh masterfully directs an instant classic with “Cinderella,” Walt Disney Pictures’ latest animated great-turned live-action fairy tale. Preceded by the 2010 blockbuster “Alice in Wonderland” and the 2014  summer hit “Maleficent” (the “Sleeping Beauty” tale told from the villainess’ point-of-view), “Cinderella” emerges as the best of the three re-imagined tales so far – mainly by  sticking with the narrative fairy tale fans know and love while making subtle yet strong changes where it counts the most.

Lily James stars as Ella, who as a child loses her mother (Hayley Atwell) and gains a cruel stepmother (the deliciously evil Cate Blanchett) and two stepsisters (Holliday Grainger and Sophie McShera) when her father (Ben Chaplin) remarries. Trapped as a servant to her stepmother and stepsisters after her father dies, Ella – who is dubbed “Cinderella” by one of the stepsisters – sees a glimmer of hope through a chance meeting with the handsome Kit (Richard Madden), who keeps secret from the young woman that he’s really a prince who will soon inherit a kingdom.

Interview: Helena Bonham Carter (U.S. exclusive)

Interview: Kenneth Branagh

“Cinderella” works on every level, from using real landscape complimented by lavish castle set pieces and costumes; to stellar acting, a mystical atmosphere, Patrick Doyle’s moving score and the perfect mix of humor and heart.

The movie is also very emotional, especially in times of loss, but not necessarily depressing. It effectively helps build the character of Cinderella, who while taught by her dying mother to “have courage and be kind” – shuttering the damsel in the distress characterization from earlier interpretations of the tale.  Cinderella is now a strong and independent young woman who is an equal, essentially, to the prince, even while their social status couldn’t be any further apart.

Naturally, “Cinderella” wouldn’t be “Cinderella” with all of its classic elements: there’s the pumpkin that turns into the carriage, the mice that transform into horses and of course, the iconic glass slippers; but even those elements feel fresh and vibrant thanks to the wondrous performance of Helena Bonham Carter as Cinderella’s Fairy Godmother.

And while Bonham Carter is only in the film for about 10 minutes (first, as an unrecognizable beggar lady who tests Cinderella’s will to be kind, only to transform into the giddy, Bibbidi-Bobbidi white-gowned magician who creates the girl’s transportation to the beautifully staged Castle Ball) – she makes the most out of every second she’s on-screen. Thankfully, Branagh puts his talented star to good use by making her the narrator of the film, and even has her sing the iconic song “Bibbidi-Bobbidi-Boo” during the end credits.

Despite the smattering of talent that surrounds her, James’ glowing performance as Cinderella helps the “Downtown Abbey” star carry the film with relative ease on her delicate shoulders. She’s the perfect choice to play the time-honored character with a sweet smile, an air of innocence and steady charisma and charm that makes you root for her from start to finish. True, we all know how the tale ends, but what an exciting, freshly mowed path through the gorgeous forestland “Cinderella” takes us on to get there. It’s a brilliant movie suited for girls and boys, and women and men of all ages.

Playing before “Cinderella” is the new “Frozen” short film “Frozen Fever,” a delightful seven-minute tale about a sniffling Elsa (voice of Idina Menzel), who’s trying to arrange a birthday party for her sister, Anna (Kristen Bell) despite a nasty cold. Elsa’s under-the-weather for the entire short, but her condition helps produce clever additions to the world of “Frozen” and the loveable goofball snowman Olaf (Josh Gad).

Most importantly, parents may find their children letting go of the Oscar-winning “Frozen” song “Let it Go,” as “Frozen Fever” debuts a memorable new song, “Making Today a Perfect Day.” It’s a perfect song for a perfect mini-sequel of sorts, since it takes place after the events of the first film.

Maleficent Disney Sixth Scale Figure

“Run All Night” (R) 3 stars (out of four)

Liam Neeson is back with a particular set of skills – although time does appear to be catching up with him, finally – with “Run All Night,” a gritty, fast-paced crime thriller that boasts a terrific cast to help the film rise above its convoluted storyline.

Neeson stars as Jimmy Conlon, a broken-down former hit man for his longtime friend/powerful New York City mob boss Sean Maguire (Ed Harris). In an unfortunate set of circumstances, Jimmy shoots and kills Sean’s only son, Danny (Boyd Holbrook) who was a hair-trigger away from his shooting Jimmy’s son, Mike (Joel Kinnaman), for witnessing a murder.

Despite their long history together, Sean orders a hit on Mike so Jimmy can suffer the same pain of losing a child. But Jimmy’s not going to give in easy, and devises a plan to stay on the run throughout the night with his estranged son, in an effort to try to make things right with his former crime confidant.

Neeson seems only to be playing a variation of the “Taken”-like character that’s dominated the action crime genre in the past few years, and it appears now that he’s just on this side of being unbelievable. Neeson’s a big man at 6 feet 4 inches and is no doubt fit for a man of 62, but given the physical and mental toll his life of crime has taken on him (he’s executed dozens of people, with some of the hits closer to home than he’d like to remember), and it’s a wonder how he disarms and beats people (or shoots them with skilled precision) for a guy who walks with a limp and was falling-down drunk just hours before.

Harris, meanwhile, is chilling as the ruthless crime boss, while Kinnaman – who rose to prominence in the brilliant AMC-turned-Netflix-series “The Killing,” is excellent as the moral compass of the film. He’s about the only main character that you can root for, given Jimmy’s and Sean’s menacing pasts. Vincent D’Onofrio also shines as the film’s only straight cop in a city otherwise owned by Sean’s power, while Common is wicked as a hit man hired to complete the job that his crew can’t seem to get done.

In the end, fans of shoot ’em ups with high body counts will no doubt be satisfied by “Run All Night,” despite the film’s obvious faults. And while “Run All Night” leaves more to be desired, it’s at least a major improvement over Neeson’s lackluster third film in the “Taken” franchise.

Loki Marvel Sixth Scale Figure