Tag Archives: Chris Pratt

Movie review: ‘The LEGO Movie 2’ another awesome adventure

‘The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part’ (PG)

Cue the peppy music: Everything is awesome again in “The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part,” the hotly anticipated sequel to the 2014 (building) block-buster. Like the original, the film is driven by a smart script, snappy dialogue and dazzling visual effects, all of which are anchored by a poignant human story that most every viewers will be able to relate to, whether you’re a kid or adult.

Set five years after the events after the original film – which, as it turns out was a LEGO battle going on in the imagination of a young boy named Finn (Jadon Sand) and a disagreement he has in real-life with his Dad (Will Farrell) for playing with the adult’s massive LEGO collection – “The Second Part” finds Finn fighting with another enemy in the family: his younger sister, Bianca (Brooklynn Prince).


AUDIO: Tim reviews “The Lego Movie 2” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show” (segment begins at 4 minute mark).

Finn and Bianca are naturally fighting constantly as brothers and sisters do, and their battlefield is once again the LEGO setting in the family basement, where Bianca’s LEGO Friends and DUPLO collection invades Finn’s space of traditional LEGO bricks. The already aggravated situation comes to a head, though, when Bianca’s characters kidnap Lucy (Elizabeth Banks), Batman (Will Arnett), Unikitty (Allison Brie) and company, and they’ve blasted off to the girl’s imaginative menagerie of characters and settings in space, where the captives strangely find themselves adapting to their new settings with relative ease. Meanwhile, Emmett has formed a new bond with the smart and resourceful Rex Dangervest (Pratt) in an effort to save his friends, but Rex isn’t all who he seems.

The key to the success of “The Second Part” is that screenwriters (and original co-directors) Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, along with director Mike Mitchell completely changes the setting from the first film’s massive LEGO metropolis to first a desolate setting reminiscent of the apocalyptic wasteland of “Mad Max: Fury Road,” and before blasting off into outer space. Changing up the setting was essential in avoiding any sort of repetitiveness from the first film, even though the fun personalities of Emmett, Lucy and the hilarious Batman all remain, and are joined by the likes of new characters like Queen Waterva Wa’Nibi (Tiffany Haddish).

There are familiarities, naturally, like pop culture references (Pratt’s own “Jurassic World” films get a nod with dinosaur characters), and like the first film, “The Second Part” is punctuated with timeless real-life lessons — lessons that are just as relatable and sweet as the moment of bonding between father and son that wrapped up the first “LEGO Movie.”

While fans are bound to debate which “LEGO Movie” is better, there’s no question that the computer animation is just as impressive if not better than the original. That’s because like the first film, the characters come to life in static-like motion reminiscent of stop-motion animation, one of the most under-appreciated art forms in the movie business. Maintaining that style is clearly important to Lord, Miller and Mitchell, though, which is likely why they hired “Robot Chicken” alum Trisha Gum as their animation director to keep the film’s raw but impressive animation sensibilities in place. For the third “LEGO Movie” in a row – “The LEGO Batman Movie” was released in-between — the characters and the vistas are visually stunning. In fact, calling “The Second Part” awesome is almost an understatement.

Lammometer: 8 (out of 10)

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for The KQ92 Morning Show,” “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC), WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere.

Copyright 2019 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Movie review: ‘Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom’ sadly falls short of expectations

“Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” (PG-13)

Oh, how the mighty have fallen with “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,” the hotly anticipated sequel to the 2015 mega blockbuster “Jurassic World” and fourth installment in the “Jurassic Park” series. Dark and bleak with no real fun to be had, “Fallen Kingdom” isn’t a bad film, at least from the technical standpoint, where the dinosaurs are as big and loud and scary as ever. Instead, the burden falls on the creatives, who clearly found out that the once-inspired story line of bringing dinosaurs back to life through the wonders of DNA is close to running its course.

“Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” is set three years after the last film, and it appears theme park on the (fictional) Isla Nubar off Costa Rica is doomed by erupting volcanos. And while the island is unoccupied by humans, the government is faced with the excruciating decision of trying to save all the cloned dinosaur species or simply let the monolithic creatures become extinct once again, perhaps forever.


Tim reviews “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” with Adrienne Broaddus on KARE 11.

Despite the havoc wreaked by the dinosaurs in the first film, Jurassic World operator Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard) is intent on preserving the creatures, and she seems to have found a viable solution when the partner to late Jurassic Park founder John Hammond (Richard Attenborough), Benjamin Lockwood (James Cromwell) funds a mission to transport about a dozen dinosaur species to an island sanctuary where they will be free to roam the way nature intended. The mission can’t be completed, however, without the help of Claire and dinosaur wrangler Owen Grady (Chris Pratt), who soon enough learn they are pawns in a plan to use the dinosaurs for sinister purposes.


AUDIO: Listen to Tim’s review of “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” on “The KQ Morning Show” with Tom Barnard.

Admittedly, director J.A. Boyona and co-screenwriters Derek Connolly and Colin Trevorrow (who directed the first “Jurassic World”) are in a tough spot when it comes to expanding the already limited “Jurassic” saga storyline with “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom.” Let’s say they move the dinosaurs to a sanctuary where they live in peace and nobody sees or interacts with them, then you have a boring movie. If another park is created, then it’s a rip-off of the previous movies.

All that’s left, at least as far as this film is concerned, is having the dinosaurs fall into the wrong hands of people with (what else?) deadly intentions. Worse yet, the story is predictable almost from the get-go, from the time Claire and Owen meet the operation’s commander (Ted Levine) who is saddled with all the classic traits of ne’er do-well up to no good.

Despite its predictability, “Jurassic World” still manages to be entertaining, especially when its dinosaurs (in particular the genetically altered ones) go on the rampage against their weak human counterparts. No matter how many times you’ve seen it happen, whether in the original “Jurassic Park” trilogy or “Jurassic World,” there’s nothing that gets stale about an effective CG dinosaur relentlessly pursuing their human prey. In fact, like the first film, the sequences are so jarring that it makes you wonder just how the studio got away with a PG-13 rating, when the violence clearly merits an R.

While the first “Jurassic World” felt fresh, fun and inventive, “Fallen Kingdom” is doomed by taking itself too seriously. To begin with, while Pratt played his role fairly straight-up the first time around but was still amusing, he’s only afforded a few times to lighten the mood in “Fallen Kingdom.” Howard seems to be given less to work with in the film, too, including those pesky high heels which were swapped out for boots this time around. The biggest waste of talent, though, comes with the bait-and-switch move Universal pulled with original “Jurassic Park” star Jeff Goldblum, who reprises his Ian Malcolm for a pair of brief scenes where he shows none of his trademark, wry sense of humor whatsoever.

With any luck, Trevorrow, who is on board to helm the third film, will bring Goldblum back and give him some meaningful screen time if “Jurassic World” has any chance of being restored to its former glory.

Lammometer: 6 (out of 10)

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for The KQ92 Morning Show,” “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC), WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere.

Copyright 2018 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Movie review: ‘Avengers: Infinity War’ falls short of hype

“Avengers: Infinity War” (PG-13)

Almost 10 years since the debut of “Iron Man” and the birth of the Marvel Cinematic Universe under the auspices of Marvel Studios, the long-awaited gathering of Earth’s Mightiest Heroes and beyond are assembling for “Avengers: Infinity War,” an ambitious yet ultimately underwhelming superhero extravaganza. While the gathering of nearly two dozen Avengers worked wonders for “Captain America: Civil War” in 2016, the addition the Guardians of the Galaxy and the full reveal of the cosmic supervillain Thanos has led to an overstuffed film that is forced to water down even the most basic of a plotline as it trudges through its 2 hour, 29 minute run time.

The set-up for “Avengers: Infinity War” has been a long-time coming: Thanos (the voice of Josh Brolin), the all-powerful alien hell-bent on destruction who was first introduced in the after-credits scene in 2012’s “The Avengers,” is on a straight-forward mission. He possesses a gauntlet that has room to hold six Infinity Stones – the combination of which will give him the power to wipe out billions of beings in the universe. Some of the stones are hidden in distant worlds, but two that he is seeking are in the possession of a pair of superheroes on Earth, which means the Avengers, who were left fractured by different ideologies at the end of “Captain America: Civil War,” must regroup if they’re to thwart Thanos’ plan. That means sacrifices will undoubtedly be made, changing the makeup of humanity’s greatest guardians forever.


VIDEO: Watch Tim’s review with Zac Lashway on “KARE 11 News at 11.”

Directed by brothers Anthony and Joe Russo, perhaps the biggest obstacle “Avengers: Infinity War” faces is trying to find a meaningful way to incorporate several iconic characters under one giant umbrella without cheating viewers of brilliance several of the superheroes showed us in their individual films. The directing duo does their best by breaking the conglomerate into smaller teams, but the problem there is, some groups and subplots far stronger than others.

While the roster of actors for the film boasts talent across the board (among the cavalcade of stars are Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, Scarlett Johansson, Chadwick Boseman, Tom Hiddleston, Chris Pratt and Zoe Saldana), it no doubt is a tough act to follow the always-great Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark/Iron Man, who along with Tom Holland (Peter Parker/Spider-Man) and Benedict Cumberbatch (Doctor Strange), Mark Ruffalo (Bruce Banner/Hulk) and Benedict Wong (Dr. Strange’s assistant Wong) — who provide the film a stellar action segment early on. Naturally, a film is going to suffer when all the air is let out of that balloon and we don’t hear from the group for at least another half-hour, which contributes to the film’s pacing problem.

Is “Infinity War” a disaster? Not by any means, it just feels like Marvel Studios has finally pushed its luck too far and produced an uneven film that has far too many peaks and valleys, occasionally made confusing by the introduction of new worlds that will be lost on everybody in the audience apart from the faithful readers of the original Marvel comic books. True, the visuals are spectacular as expected in “Infinity War,” but long gone are the days where audiences can merely be wowed by eye candy alone.

One sensibility “Infinity War” has maintained, fortunately, is the sense of humor that has been a benchmark for most of the Marvel movies, and there are plenty of laugh-out-loud moments in the film. That’s a good thing considering “Infinity War” is by far the darkest Marvel Studios film to date, where the teases of major characters dying are finally realized. Thanos by far is Marvel’s most ruthless villain to date, and he doesn’t think twice about dispatching his adversaries in quick and decisive manner. In an odd sort of way, though, the quick deaths will make audiences feel cheated because after knowing some of these characters for so long, you’d expect much more fanfare in their exits than you actually end up getting.

There’s one other issue with the film, which won’t be revealed here, regarding one of the Infinity Stones and its power. It will no doubt be addressed in the untitled fourth chapter of “The Avengers” set for release a year from now, and it’s a plot detail so crucial that it could end up making “Infinity War” seem irrelevant. With any luck, Marvel Studios will hold steady and continue the path this storyline is on if they want “Infinity War” to hold a significant place in the studio’s short, but illustrious history, no matter how lesser of a film it already is compared its predecessors. Ultimately, the willingness to embrace change, no matter how dark it is, is the best thing “Infinity War” has going for it.

Lammometer: 6 (out of 10)

AUDIO: Tim reviews “Avengers: Infinity War” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show” (segment begins 2:30 in).

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for The KQ92 Morning Show,” “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC), WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere.

Copyright 2018 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Movie review: ‘Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2’ rivals original

“Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” (PG-13) 

The quirkiest antiheroes in the universe are back and funnier than ever in “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2,” a sequel that often times matches the greatness of the original if not exceeds it.

The whole crew — Star-Lord (Chris Pratt), Gamora (Zoe Saldana), Drax (Dave Bautista), Rocket (voice of Bradley Cooper) and Groot (voice of Vin Diesel) — are back, this time to encounter Star-Lord’s long-lost father, Ego (Kurt Russell).

Listen to Tim’s review of “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” on “The KQ 92 Morning Show” with Tom Barnard.

While writer-director James Gunn’s film gets serious at times as it confronts family issues in and outside of the core group, Bautista and Cooper are laugh-out funny throughout, and easily keep the film from being dragged into the doldrums.

“Vol. 2” has it all: The special effects are beyond compare, the action is engaging and most important of all, some big twists make the film unexpectedly poignant.

Like the first “Guardians” film, “Vol. 2” is loaded with nostalgic songs from the 1970s, which once again sets the perfect tone during the entire picture. Be sure to stick around at the very end as there are not one or two, but five post-credits scenes. “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3” is already in the works, and it can’t come soon enough.

Lammometer: 8 (out of 10)

Watch Tim’s review of “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” with Alicia Lewis on KARE 11.