Category Archives: Movie Reviews

Refreshing spin aside, ‘The Kitchen’ doesn’t quite elevate mob genre

“The Kitchen” (R)

While she’s no Francis Ford Coppola or Martin Scorsese, you still have to admire writer-director Andrea Berloff for her willingness to get her hands bloody with “The Kitchen,” a 1970s-era mob movie rooted in a DC graphic novel series that features the burgeoning dramatic talents of comedy star Melissa McCarthy. But while McCarthy takes another stroll out of her comfort zone, she’s chosen a film that, while it flips its script in a genre dominated by men, it ultimately doesn’t contain anything apart from its role-reversals that makes it rise above what we’ve seen before.

Following her Best Actress nomination for the underrated 2018 drama “Can You Ever Forgive Me?” McCarthy is one of a trio of mob wives who have no choice but to take over their husband’s crime racket in Hell’s Kitchen in New York City when the men are sent to prison for three years.


AUDIO: Hear Tim’s review of “The Kitchen” and more with Paul Douglas and Jordana Green on “Paul and Jordana” on WCCO-AM. Segment is brought to you by  Michael Bryant and Bradshaw & Bryant.

McCarthy stars as Kathy, the wife of a small-time Irish mobster (Brian d’Arcy James), who along with his partners (James Badge Dale and Jeremy Bobb), get busted by the FBI during an armed robbery gone terribly awry. Struggling to make ends meet while their husbands are in jail, Kathy, Ruby (Tiffany Haddish) and Claire (Elizabeth Moss) decide to pick up where the mobsters left off and begin to provide protection to neighborhood businesses from thugs – and as a result of their success, begin building their own criminal empire. It doesn’t take long, though, before the new kids on the crime block  out-step their boundaries and land in the crosshairs of other members in the Irish mob, as well as a local Italian crime head (Bill Camp).

While McCarthy and Haddish are particularly known for their comedic talents, they play their roles in “The Kitchen” with complete seriousness. That’s not to say there isn’t any comedy in the film, as Domhnall Gleeson provides darkly awkward laughs as a former member of the crew who returns to town just as the fearless female trio begins to take a foothold on their neighborhood and beyond. Margo Martindale is a standout, too, as the blunt, no-nonsense mother-in-law of Ruby who pushes her daughter-in-law to the limit as she tries to make do while her husband is locked away.

On the other hand, rapper-turned-actor Common is wasted in a role that doesn’t yield much until a surprise twist later in the film, and the bulk of the film’s large supporting cast end up being portrayed as nothing but stereotypical mobsters.

While Berloff’s gangster film is a far cry from “The Godfather” and “Goodfellas,” her work definitely matches up to the similarly themed 2018 crime drama “Widows,” starring Viola Davis. There’s no question the director captures the gritty look of Hell’s Kitchen and brutal thuggery of criminals in the 1970s, which shouldn’t come as a surprise given she’s penned the screenplays for such hard-hitting films as “Straight Outta Compton” (which earned her a shared Oscar nomination for Best Original Screenplay) and Oliver Stone’s “World Trade Center.”


AUDIO: Hear Tim’s review of “The Kitchen” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show” on KQRS-FM. Segment is brought to you by  Michael Bryant and Bradshaw & Bryant.

Berloff should also be commended for her resolve to stir the pot in “The Kitchen,” as her female power trio do much more than issue orders to their underlings. In fact, the filmmaker turns one of the main characters into an unforgiving executioner, and the other two into coldblooded crime bosses who call out ruthless hits on people in the same, matter-of-fact manner as their male counterparts. However, that’s where the quandary comes in. While it’s refreshing to see the women rising up and kicking ass for a change, their actions are truly reprehensible, making it almost impossible to root for them. No matter who is in charge, “The Kitchen,” if anything, proves that crime does not pay.

Lammometer: 6.5 (out of 10)

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for “The KQ92 Morning Show,”  WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere. On TV, Tim has made hundreds of guest appearances on “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC).

Copyright 2019 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Movie review: ‘Hobbs & Shaw’ leaves ‘Fast & Furious’ franchise in dust

“Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw” (PG-13)

With the “Fast & Furious” franchise seemingly in the rearview mirror, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and Jason Statham are off roaring to bigger and better things with “Hobbs & Shaw,” an outrageously entertaining spinoff movie featuring the friendly adversaries from the most recent chapters in the Vin Diesel film series.

“Hobbs & Shaw” gives the exact amount of time to Johnson’s Luke Hobbs and Statham’s Deckard Shaw to begin the film by inventively splitting the screen and their scenes in two, where they go about their morning routines, which wildly differ. Eventually, though, the lawman Hobbs’ and the reformed bad guy Shaw’s paths converge, as they’re both asked by their countries’ intelligence services to recover a programmable virus being carried by a lethal MI-6 agent. The stakes are raised when the MI-G agent turns out being Shaw’s estranged sister, Hattie (Vanessa Kirby), and her revelation that he had the virus – protected by capsules – injected into her bloodstream.

Interview: David Leitch talks “Deadpool 2”

Making matters worse, a secret organization hell-bent on winnowing out the weaker of the human species on Earth sends the technologically enhanced super soldier Brixton (Idris Elba) to recover the virus, and Hobbs and Shaw quickly find out that there’s little they can do to stop him. That’s bad news if he gets his hands on the virus, since it will kill millions if it’s unleashed into the world.


AUDIO: Tim reviews “Hobbs and Shaw” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show” on KQRS-FM. Segment brought to you by Michael Bryant and Bradshaw & Bryant.

Yes, “Hobbs and Shaw” is chockfull of the same over-the-top action and doomsday scenarios that turned the “Fast & Furious” movies into a multibillion franchise, but instead of being a big, loud and dumb movie franchise that’s lost its sense of humor with its last outing, “Hobbs & Shaw” captures perfectly the chemistry that was clearly evident between Johnson and Statham in the “The Fate of the Furious.” Plus, with “Deadpool 2” director David Leitch at the helm, the film finds a way to balance the excessive crash, boom, bang with several laugh-out-loud funny moments humor throughout, making “Hobbs & Shaw” big loud and smart, and even throwing in a bit of science fiction into the plot, to boot.

Even better, Leitch employed a couple brilliant big star cameos in the film to amp up the funny, even though the film, truthfully, already had enough star power with an impressive Kirby and charismatic Elba in sizable roles, and the always delightful Helen Mirren reprising her kick-ass role from “The Fate of the Furious” as the Shaw family matriarch.

Clearly the brightest stars in “Hobbs & Shaw,” though, are Johnson and Statham, who clearly having a ball throughout the movie (there were no reports of Johnson calling anybody in the film a “candyass,” err, Vin Diesel). Johnson is especially notable because it’s clear he’s in his element, a place he hasn’t been in the underwhelming action pictures “Rampage” and “Skyscraper.” It just goes to show that a performer, once again, is only as good as their script, and even more to their benefit, is a skilled filmmaker like Leitch and a buddy movie partner like Statham.

Universal Pictures

In comparison to any of the chapters in the franchise that launched it, because of the camaraderie of the cast and clockwork precision of Leitch and his crew of filmmakers, “Hobbs & Shaw” doesn’t even feel like a “Fast & Furious” film. That’s a good thing because honestly, the “Fast” films feel like they’ve become a game of one-upmanship between cast members, and the mandate has been put on the directors to come up with new and more ridiculous ways of topping the action of the film before it.

With “Hobbs & Shaw,” as Leitch has proven before – first as the co-director of “John Wick” and again on “Deadpool 2” – the goal of the movie is to make it as entertaining as possible without taking itself too seriously. And while we already know the characters (even though nothing is lost by not seeing the previous “Fast” movies), “Hobbs & Shaw” in an odd sort of way feels new, refreshing and fun – the way summer popcorn movies should be.

Lammometer: 9 (out of 10)

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for “The KQ92 Morning Show,”  WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere. On TV, Tim has made hundreds of guest appearances on “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC).

Copyright 2019 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Movie review: ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’ not typical Tarantino tale

 “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” (R)

Clearly made as a love letter to the La La landscape of the late 1960s, “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” is a surprisingly tame entry in writer-director Quentin Tarantino’s otherwise wild body of work as a filmmaker. It proves that Tarantino’s love for the end of the Golden Era in Hollywood is warm and fuzzy, but when its framed as a feature film, perhaps “Once Upon a Time” is warm and fuzzy to a fault. In short, the film lacks the Tarantino bite we associate with the inventive filmmaker until its third act, leaving in its wake several bland moments during the first hour and a half of the film.

“Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” is largely about TV star Rick Dalton (Leonardo Di Caprio) and his longtime stuntman-turned-personal assistant Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) as Rick begins to realize his downslide as lead actor who is now largely relegated guest shots as “the heavy” on episodic television. Of course, Rick and Cliff are fictional characters in Tarantino’s “Hollywood,” but much like writer-director did with “Inglorious Basterds,” he drops the characters in among real-life figures and settings to construct what becomes a revisionist tale set over nine months in 1969 Hollywood.


AUDIO: Hear Tim review “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” with Jordana Green and guest host Todd Walker on “The Paul and Jordana Show” on WCCO-AM. Segment brought to you by Mike Bryant and Bradshaw & Bryant.

Most prominent of the real-life figures portrayed are actress Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie), who cruelly met her fate while eight-months pregnant along with friend/Hollywood hairstylist Jay Sebring (Emile Hirsch) and two others at the hands of the murderous Manson family on Aug. 9, 1969. Tate’s husband, director Roman Polanski (Polish actor Rafal Zawierucha) is also featured briefly in a few fleeting scenes, while Charles Manson (Damon Herriman) only turns up once in the whole film.

A slow burn set over 2 hours and 41 minutes that eventually rolls up to the private neighborhood where members of the Manson family plan to kill Tate and Polanski, a restrained Tarantino holds off on his penchant for excessive screen violence until late into the third act. Before that, the other razzmatazz identified with the two-time Oscar-winning filmmaker is spread out in inspired bits and pieces throughout the first 90 minutes.

Among them is a charming (and in retrospect, heartbreaking) scene where Tate sits in a Hollywood theater to soak in the reaction to her work in Dean Martin’s Matt Helm adventure comedy “The Wrecking Crew”; and another where Kurt Russell’s producer character become a wreck on the set of a movie where Bruce Lee (Mike Moh) squares off against Cliff in a backlot in one of film’s funniest moments. Perhaps the biggest scene stealer is Julia Butters (TV’s “American Wife”), who plays a precocious 8-year-old actor (don’t call her “actress”), who puts Rick back on his heels as they’re preparing to film scenes for a TV Western (Butters brilliantly holds her own against DiCaprio in not one but two scenes).

To be sure, “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” is a nostalgic ride down memory lane for Tarantino as he expertly recreates the look and atmosphere of Tinseltown in the late 1960s, which not surprisingly has pop music hits of the era woven within. But it’s also a ride that may leave fans of his previous work feeling short-changed, especially for the lumbering first 90 minutes the film.

In short, “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” is the most un-Tarantino film Tarantino has ever done – at least until its final 45 minutes. The tension begins to ramp up when Cliff tries to visit his old colleague George Spahn (Bruce Dern) on the Spahn Movie Ranch, a once-viable filming location that is now suspiciously populated by a “community” of Charles  Manson followers. It’s there where the Manson Family is plotting out its final steps to murder Tate, who is 8 months pregnant, along with Polanski.

Effectively “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” is a 2 hour, 41 minute exercise in wish fulfillment that gives Tarantino – who has long been able to make films carte blanche in Tinseltown – the means to play around in the era of filmmaking (or in this case, TV show making) that he clearly adores.

Photo: Sony Pictures

A sort of insider’s look at the making of TV shows in the late ‘60s (and digitally swapping in Rick for Steve McQueen in “The Great Escape” ), “Once Upon a Time” even gives Tarantino the opportunity to step back in time onto sets to produce classic Westerns through the lens of such directors (turned actor) as Sam Wanamaker. He even peppers the film with several cameos, including Damian Lewis as The King of Cool Steve McQueen and Dakota Fanning in a small but unnerving turn as Manson family member Squeaky Fromme. All but squandered is Al Pacino as agent pushing Rick toward making Spaghetti Westerns; and notably absent is Samuel L. Jackson, who has been a frequent collaborator of Tarantino’s since 1994’s “Pulp Fiction.”


AUDIO: Hear Tim review “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show” on KQRS-FM. Segment brought to you by Mike Bryant and Bradshaw & Bryant.

With DiCaprio, Pitt and Robbie turning in good but not great performances, “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” will be remembered as a star-powered film that was a victim of its own hype. Just like the shiny veneer the real Hollywood gives off, the film is ultimately more about looks than it is substance, and thin veil in this case almost completely hides the ugliness of the industry.

Luckily for fans, while Tarantino gets waylaid on his trip back in time, there’s no doubt a ton of satisfaction to be had when the writer-director gives his twisty take on one of the most shocking crimes Hollywood has ever seen to conclude the film. It’s one of the few tales in “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood” that’s worth telling over and over. The rest you can close the book on.

Lammometer: 6 (out of 10)

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for “The KQ92 Morning Show,”  WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere. On TV, Tim has made hundreds of guest appearances on “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC).

Copyright 2019 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Movie review: New ‘Lion King’ impressively brings tale full-circle

“The Lion King” (PG)

The cinematic circle of life is now complete with the updated version of “The Lion King,” director Jon Favreau’s visually stunning live action rendering of the 1994 Disney animated classic. Faced with a no-win situation of either changing up the story and certainly facing fan ire or staying faithful to the 25-year-old original, director Jon Favreau took the path of least resistance and went with a virtual shot-by-shot remake of the film, which still felt energized by the photorealistic setting and characters, a winning voice cast and of course, stirring songs by Elton John and Tim Rice, as well as the iconic score by Hans Zimmer.

For the uninitiated few who’ve never seen the film on the big screen or video, “The Lion King” tells the story of Mufasa (voice of James Earl Jones – the only 1994 cast member to reprise his role), a majestic lion king who is blessed with the birth of his first cub, Simba (JD McCrary). The young lion immediately earns his birthright to become heir of the throne, which a fate Mufasa’s brother, Scar (Chiwetel Ejiofor), refuses to accept. Staging the cruel death of Mufasa and leading Simba to believe he’s at fault for it, Scar rules the pride with a villainous pack of hyenas by his side, destroying the morale of Mufasa’s queen, Sarabi (Alfre Woodard) and her loved ones and decimating the environment around them.


AUDIO: Hear Tim review “The Lion King” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show” on KQRS-FM. Segment brought to you by Mike Bryant and Bradshaw & Bryant.

Meanwhile, Simba, thought dead by Scar, escaped and grew into adulthood thanks to the comical meerkat and warthog duo of Timon (Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa (Seth Rogen), and once a full grown lion, Simba (Donald Glover) happens upon his childhood friend Nala (Beyonce Knowles-Carter) to learn of the devastation Scar has caused. Returning home to the pride to confess to accident that killed his father, Simba learns who was really responsible for Mufasa’s death, setting up a fight for the throne and a last-ditch effort to save his home.

Despite the fact that “The Lion King” is as much a remake as a remake gets, Favreau and his visual effects crew still have to be credited for creating a canvas that’s even more stunning than the director’s wondrous live-action adaptation of “The Jungle Book” in 2016. Granted, those familiar with the tale of “The Lion King” will likely hold the memories of the original film dear, and the story won’t seem nearly as fresh as when they first saw it; but that likely won’t be the case for younger viewers, and there’s no question that the new film will become a classic for a new generation.

As familiar as the new “Lion King” feels, the story does give Nala a bigger role (if you get Beyonce in your movie, you have to make it worth her while), including a new song, “Spirit,” which is destined for a Best Original Song Oscar nomination (John and Rice, who won an Oscar for “Can You Feel the Love Tonight,” also penned a pair of new songs ). The film’s photorealistic effects also make some of the characters feel more daunting, particularly the hyenas, which are much more frightening than they were in animated form (the original film was rated G).

Favreau no doubt added more subtle moments to the film, which is nearly a half-hour longer than the original. Fans will no doubt be able to discover the differences between the new “Lion King” and the original with multiple viewings, which will no doubt happen when this film reaches video after what is guaranteed a very successful theatrical run. After 25 years, “The Lion King’s” roar is as loud as ever.

Lammometer: 8 (out of 10)

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for “The KQ92 Morning Show,” “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC), WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere.

Copyright 2019 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!