Tag Archives: Donald Glover

Movie review: New ‘Lion King’ impressively brings tale full-circle

“The Lion King” (PG)

The cinematic circle of life is now complete with the updated version of “The Lion King,” director Jon Favreau’s visually stunning live action rendering of the 1994 Disney animated classic. Faced with a no-win situation of either changing up the story and certainly facing fan ire or staying faithful to the 25-year-old original, director Jon Favreau took the path of least resistance and went with a virtual shot-by-shot remake of the film, which still felt energized by the photorealistic setting and characters, a winning voice cast and of course, stirring songs by Elton John and Tim Rice, as well as the iconic score by Hans Zimmer.

For the uninitiated few who’ve never seen the film on the big screen or video, “The Lion King” tells the story of Mufasa (voice of James Earl Jones – the only 1994 cast member to reprise his role), a majestic lion king who is blessed with the birth of his first cub, Simba (JD McCrary). The young lion immediately earns his birthright to become heir of the throne, which a fate Mufasa’s brother, Scar (Chiwetel Ejiofor), refuses to accept. Staging the cruel death of Mufasa and leading Simba to believe he’s at fault for it, Scar rules the pride with a villainous pack of hyenas by his side, destroying the morale of Mufasa’s queen, Sarabi (Alfre Woodard) and her loved ones and decimating the environment around them.


AUDIO: Hear Tim review “The Lion King” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show” on KQRS-FM. Segment brought to you by Mike Bryant and Bradshaw & Bryant.

Meanwhile, Simba, thought dead by Scar, escaped and grew into adulthood thanks to the comical meerkat and warthog duo of Timon (Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa (Seth Rogen), and once a full grown lion, Simba (Donald Glover) happens upon his childhood friend Nala (Beyonce Knowles-Carter) to learn of the devastation Scar has caused. Returning home to the pride to confess to accident that killed his father, Simba learns who was really responsible for Mufasa’s death, setting up a fight for the throne and a last-ditch effort to save his home.

Despite the fact that “The Lion King” is as much a remake as a remake gets, Favreau and his visual effects crew still have to be credited for creating a canvas that’s even more stunning than the director’s wondrous live-action adaptation of “The Jungle Book” in 2016. Granted, those familiar with the tale of “The Lion King” will likely hold the memories of the original film dear, and the story won’t seem nearly as fresh as when they first saw it; but that likely won’t be the case for younger viewers, and there’s no question that the new film will become a classic for a new generation.

As familiar as the new “Lion King” feels, the story does give Nala a bigger role (if you get Beyonce in your movie, you have to make it worth her while), including a new song, “Spirit,” which is destined for a Best Original Song Oscar nomination (John and Rice, who won an Oscar for “Can You Feel the Love Tonight,” also penned a pair of new songs ). The film’s photorealistic effects also make some of the characters feel more daunting, particularly the hyenas, which are much more frightening than they were in animated form (the original film was rated G).

Favreau no doubt added more subtle moments to the film, which is nearly a half-hour longer than the original. Fans will no doubt be able to discover the differences between the new “Lion King” and the original with multiple viewings, which will no doubt happen when this film reaches video after what is guaranteed a very successful theatrical run. After 25 years, “The Lion King’s” roar is as loud as ever.

Lammometer: 8 (out of 10)

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for “The KQ92 Morning Show,” “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC), WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere.

Copyright 2019 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!

Movie review: Despite production turmoil, ‘Solo: A Star Wars Story’ manages steady flight


Click video above to see Tim’s review of ‘Solo’ with Adrienne Broaddus on KARE 11.

“Solo: A Star Wars Story” (PG-13)

While it doesn’t measure up the greatness of the original “Star Wars” trilogy or even the most recent “Star Wars” films since 2015 (including the first spinoff film “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story”), there’s still plenty to like with “Solo: A Star Wars Story,” an entertaining look at the early years of Han Solo, the character Harrison Ford made an instant cultural icon in 1977.

Alden Ehrenreich plays the young Han, a would-be space pilot who gets his famous last name as he signs up for duty with Galactic Empire as a way of getting out a precarious situation that involves his equally ambitious love, Qi’ra (Emilia Clarke). Unfortunately, the scheme results in the two being separated, with Han going on to serve the Empire in battle while Qi’ra’s fate remains unknown.

It’s on the battlefield where the astute Han meets Beckett (the always great Woody Harrelson) and Val (Thandie Newton), realizing that they are really just a pair of schemers using the uniforms of the Empire to plot a heist, with the riches set to go to pay off a debt to a nefarious gangster. Befriending a Wookie named Chewbacca (Joonas Suotano) in the direst of circumstances, the new pair convinces Beckett and Val to let them join the heist. But when the robbery doesn’t completely go off as planned, Han gets his first big taste of being a wanted man, the first step to becoming the notorious smuggler fans met in the first “Star Wars” film in 1977.


AUDIO: Hear Tim’s review of “Solo” with Tom Barnard on “The KQ Morning Show” (segment begins 2:30 in)

Fans have been dwelling on two key aspects of the production over the past year: the first being the shocking firing of original co-directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller over “creative differences,” and naturally, the gargantuan task of 28-year-old actor Alden Ehrenreich living in the shadow of Ford’s looming performance.

But it doesn’t take long after begins to realize that all the fears fans have are for naught, considering the supremely talented Ron Howard took over the reigns as the director and Ehrenreich, instead of trying to impersonate Ford, remarkably makes the character his own. Can Ford ever be replaced or for that matter, does Ehrenreich have the same of sort of charisma as his predecessor? Absolutely not; but considering that River Phoenix once made believers of fans with his spectacular turn as young Indy in the dazzling opening of “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade,” Ehrenreich proves that it is possible to capture the posturing and essence of a character, which is really how Han Solo existed — on paper –before “Star Wars” creator George Lucas serendipitously cast Ford in the space opera’s first film 41 years ago. Much in the same way, Donald Glover seems to capture the essence of Billy Dee Willliams’ Lando Calrissian, without really feeling like he’s doing an impersonation. Like Ehrenreich, he’s bring his own sort of swagger to make the character his own.

While “Solo: A Star Wars” story is far from perfect, it’s still a lot of fun to watch, particularly as co-screenwriter Lawrence Kasdan (who made his “Star Wars” writing debut as co-scribe on “The Empire Strikes Back”) fully realizes Solo’s backstory that extends from such tales told in passing in the original trilogy like “The Kessel Run” and how Han won the Millennium Falcon (“fair and square!”) from Lando. Quite a few dots are connected, in fact, and luckily for the production, they come together in such a way that the stories don’t feel contrived.

Photo: Disney/Lucasfilm

On the flip side, perhaps the biggest issue with “Solo” is the tone, which doesn’t seem to quite match the first eight films in the original saga or “Rogue One,” which chronicled the events that led up to the beginning of the 1977’s “A New Hope.” Among the misses are Lando’s droid L3-37 (voice of Phoebe Waller-Bridge), which, while an entertaining character, doesn’t fit the MO of the other droids we’ve met in the saga so far. Instead, the droid’s sardonic delivery feels like something tailor-made to appeal to the millennial crowd, and as such, is most likely a contribution of Kasdan’s son, Jonathan, who co-wrote the script. There are other tonal and fundamental inconsistencies in the film beside that, but because of the secretive nature of some of the characters, they are too big to reveal here.

While “Solo: A Star Wars Story” fits the bill, it will be interesting to see how far Lucasfilm decides to go with one-off tales without spreading the tales of the original saga too thin. “Solo” is a movie that deserved a backstory – and luckily it’s still a “Star Wars Story” worth watching despite all the drama that enveloped it during filming.

Lammometer: 7 (out of 10)

Tim Lammers reviews movies weekly for The KQ92 Morning Show,” “KARE 11 News at 11” (NBC), WCCO Radio, WJON-AM, KLZZ-FM, “The Tom Barnard Podcast” and “The BS Show” with Bob Sansevere.

Copyright 2018 DirectConversations.com

Tim Burton Book 2
Click book cover for info on how to buy!